4.7 Article

Grain refinement of Al-Si alloys by Nb-B inoculation. Part I: Concept development and effect on binary alloys

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 66, 期 -, 页码 366-375

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.08.066

关键词

Al alloys; Binary alloys; Grain refinement; Heterogeneous nucleation; Nb-B inoculation

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSCR) [EP/J013749/1]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J013749/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. EPSRC [EP/J013749/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of Nb-B inoculation on Al-Si alloys for their grain refinement has been studied through the analysis of binary Al-xSi (where x = 1-10 wt.%) to avoid possible effects of other alloying elements. In Part I of this work the concept development of the Nb-B inoculation is discussed in detail on the basis of the theoretical and fundamental concepts employed (i.e. pro-peritectic particles formation, lattice structures and mismatch as well as analogies between the Al-Ti/Al-Nb or Ti-Si/Nb-Si binary phase diagrams). The systematic study of the addition of different level of Nb-B inoculation to pure Al permitted to determine the best addition rate. From the microstructural and thermal analysis of binary Al-xSi alloys it is found that Nb-B inoculation is highly suitable for Al-Si alloy with Si content greater than 6 wt.%. As results of the Nb-B inoculation the microstructural features of binary Al-xSi alloys (i.e. primary Al a-grains and eutectic phase) are significantly refined. Most importantly, the inoculation of Al-Si cast alloys with Nb-B is not characterised by any visible poisoning effect (i.e. formation of silicides) which is the drawback of using commercial Al-Ti-B master alloys on Al cast alloys. The effect of Nb-B inoculation on commercial Al-Si alloys (which normally include other alloying elements in their chemical composition) is assessed in Part II of this work. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据