4.8 Article

Different-Level Redundancy-Resolution and Its Equivalent Relationship Analysis for Robot Manipulators Using Gradient-Descent and Zhang et al.'s Neural-Dynamic Methods

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
卷 59, 期 8, 页码 3146-3155

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2011.2106092

关键词

Equivalence; neural dynamics; quadratic programming (QP); redundancy resolution; robot arms

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61075121, 60935001]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-07-0887]
  3. Yat-sen Innovative Talents Cultivation Program for Excellent Tutors
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To solve the inverse kinematic problem of redundant robot manipulators, two redundancy-resolution schemes are investigated: one is resolved at joint-velocity level, and the other is resolved at joint-acceleration level. Both schemes are reformulated as a quadratic programming (QP) problem. Two recurrent neural networks (RNNs) are then developed for the online solution of the resultant QP problem. The first RNN solver is based on the gradient-descent method and is termed as gradient neural network (GNN). The other solver is based on Zhang et al.'s neural-dynamic method and is termed as Zhang neural network (ZNN). The computer simulations performed on a three-link planar robot arm and the PUMA560 manipulator demonstrate the efficacy of the two redundancy-resolution schemes and two RNN QP-solvers presented, as well as the superiority of the ZNN QP-solver compared to the GNN one. More importantly, the simulation results show that the solutions of the two presented schemes fit well with each other, i.e., the two different-level redundancy-resolution schemes could be equivalent in some sense. The theoretical analysis based on the gradient-descent method and Zhang et al.'s neural-dynamic method further substantiates the new finding about the different-level redundancy-resolution equivalence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据