4.7 Article

Cluster-Based Co-Saliency Detection

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING
卷 22, 期 10, 页码 3766-3778

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2013.2260166

关键词

Saliency detection; co-saliency; co-segmentation; weakly supervised learning

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB329305]
  2. National High-Tech R&D Program of China [2012AA011503]
  3. 100 Talents Programme of The Chinese Academy of Sciences
  4. Tsinghua-Tencent Joint Laboratory for Internet Innovation Technology
  5. Tianjin Key Technologies RD Program [11ZCKFGX00800]
  6. NSF [IIS-0844566, IIS-1216528]
  7. NIH [R01 MH094343]
  8. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  9. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [1360568] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Co-saliency is used to discover the common saliency on the multiple images, which is a relatively underexplored area. In this paper, we introduce a new cluster-based algorithm for co-saliency detection. Global correspondence between the multiple images is implicitly learned during the clustering process. Three visual attention cues: contrast, spatial, and corresponding, are devised to effectively measure the cluster saliency. The final co-saliency maps are generated by fusing the single image saliency and multiimage saliency. The advantage of our method is mostly bottom-up without heavy learning, and has the property of being simple, general, efficient, and effective. Quantitative and qualitative experiments result in a variety of benchmark datasets demonstrating the advantages of the proposed method over the competing co-saliency methods. Our method on single image also outperforms most the state-of-the-art saliency detection methods. Furthermore, we apply the co-saliency method on four vision applications: co-segmentation, robust image distance, weakly supervised learning, and video foreground detection, which demonstrate the potential usages of the co-saliency map.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据