4.7 Article

An Augmented Lagrangian Approach to the Constrained Optimization Formulation of Imaging Inverse Problems

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING
卷 20, 期 3, 页码 681-695

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2010.2076294

关键词

Convex optimization; frames; image reconstruction; image restoration; inpainting; total-variation

资金

  1. EU [MEST-CT-2005-021175]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT)
  3. Portuguese Ministry of Science and Higher Education [PTDC/EEA-TEL/104515/2008]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/EEA-TEL/104515/2008] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose a new fast algorithm for solving one of the standard approaches to ill-posed linear inverse problems (IPLIP), where a (possibly nonsmooth) regularizer is minimized under the constraint that the solution explains the observations sufficiently well. Although the regularizer and constraint are usually convex, several particular features of these problems (huge dimensionality, nonsmoothness) preclude the use of off-the-shelf optimization tools and have stimulated a considerable amount of research. In this paper, we propose a new efficient algorithm to handle one class of constrained problems (often known as basis pursuit denoising) tailored to image recovery applications. The proposed algorithm, which belongs to the family of augmented Lagrangian methods, can be used to deal with a variety of imaging IPLIP, including deconvolution and reconstruction from compressive observations (such as MRI), using either total-variation or wavelet-based (or, more generally, frame-based) regularization. The proposed algorithm is an instance of the so-called alternating direction method of multipliers, for which convergence sufficient conditions are known; we show that these conditions are satisfied by the proposed algorithm. Experiments on a set of image restoration and reconstruction benchmark problems show that the proposed algorithm is a strong contender for the state-of-the-art.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据