4.7 Article

Spectral Image Classification From Optimal Coded-Aperture Compressive Measurements

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2013.2272378

关键词

Classification; coded aperture; coded-aperture snapshot spectral imaging (CASSI); hyperspectral imagery; principal component analysis (PCA); restricted isometry property (RIP); sparsity

资金

  1. Army Research Laboratory
  2. Army Research Office [W911NF-11-1-0368]
  3. National Science Foundation [EECS-0725422, CCF-0915800]
  4. Office of Naval Research [NOOO14-1O-C-0199]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditional hyperspectral imaging sensors acquire high-dimensional data that are used for the discrimination of objects and features in a scene. Recently, a novel architecture known as the coded-aperture snapshot spectral imaging (CASSI) system has been developed for the acquisition of compressive spectral image data with just a few coded focal plane array measurements. This paper focuses on developing a classification approach with hyperspectral images directly from CASSI compressive measurements, without first reconstructing the full data cube. The proposed classification method uses the compressive measurements to find the sparse vector representation of the test pixel in a given training dictionary. The estimated sparse vector is obtained by solving a sparsity-constrained optimization problem and is then used to directly determine the class of the unknown pixel. The performance of the proposed classifier is improved by taking optimal CASSI compressive measurements obtained when optimal coded apertures are used in the optical system. The set of optimal coded apertures is designed such that the CASSI sensing matrix satisfies a restricted isometry property with high probability. Several simulations illustrate the performance of the proposed classifier using optimal coded apertures and the gain in the classification accuracy obtained over using traditional aperture codes in CASSI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据