4.7 Article

Random-Selection-Based Anomaly Detector for Hyperspectral Imagery

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2010.2081677

关键词

Anomaly detection; hyperspectral images; multivariate outlier detection

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2011CB707105]
  2. 863 High Technology Program of the People's Republic of China [2009AA12Z114]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40930532, 40771139, 40901213]
  4. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [200804861058]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anomaly detection in hyperspectral images is of great interest in the target detection domain since it requires no prior information and makes full use of the spectral differences revealed in hyperspectral images. The current anomaly detection methods are susceptible to anomalies in the processing window range or the image scope. In addition, for the local anomaly detection methods themselves, it is difficult to determine the window size suitable for processing background statistics. This paper proposes an anomaly detection method based on the random selection of background pixels, the random-selection-based anomaly detector (RSAD). Pixels are randomly selected from the image scene to represent the background statistics; the random selections are performed a sufficient number of times; blocked adaptive computationally efficient outlier nominators are used to detect anomalies each time after a proper subset of background pixels is selected; finally, a fusion procedure is employed to avoid contamination of the background statistics by anomaly pixels. In addition, the real-time implementation of the RSAD is also developed by random selection from updating data and QR decomposition. Several hyperspectral data sets are used in the experiments, and the RSAD shows a better performance than the current hyperspectral anomaly detection algorithms. The real-time version also outperforms its real-time counterparts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据