4.7 Article

Estimating High Spatial Resolution Clear-Sky Land Surface Upwelling Longwave Radiation From MODIS Data

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2008.2005206

关键词

Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS); neural networks; remote sensing; satellite applications; surface radiation budget (SRB); surface upwelling longwave radiation (LWUP)

资金

  1. NASA [NNX08AC53G]
  2. NASA [NNX08AC53G, 103055] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Surface upwelling longwave radiation (LWUP) is an important component in the surface radiation budget. Existing satellite-derived LWUP data sets are too coarse to support high-resolution numerical models, and their accuracy needs to be improved. In this paper, we evaluate three methods for estimating clear-sky land LWUP from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data at I-km spatial resolution. The three methods are as follows: 1) the temperature-emissivity method; 2) the linear model method; and 3) the artificial neural network (ANN) model method. Methods 2 and 3 are new methods based on extensive radiative transfer simulations and statistical analysis. We explicitly considered surface emissivity effects by incorporating the University of California Santa Barbara emissivity library in the radiative transfer simulation. The three methods were evaluated using ground-measured LWUP from six SURFRAD sites. Although methods 2 and 3 were developed using MODIS Terra atmospheric profiles, they were applied to both Terra and Aqua data because the designs of the two sensors are similar. The root mean squared errors (rmses) of the ANN model method are smaller than that or the other two methods at all sites. The averaged rmses of the ANN model method are 15.89 W/m(2) (Terra) and 14.57 W/m(2) (Aqua); the averaged biases are -8.67 W/m(2) (Terra) and -7.21 W/m(2) (Aqua). The biases and rmses for Aqua are similar to 1.3 W/m(2) smaller than that of Terra. The biases and rmses of the ANN model method are similar to 5 W/m(2) smaller than that of the temperature-emissivity method and similar to 2.5 W/m(2) smaller than that of the linear model method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据