4.8 Article

iPatch: A Many-Objective Type-2 Fuzzy Logic System for Field Workforce Optimization

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 502-514

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2862394

关键词

Fuzzy dominance; genetic algorithms (GAs); many-objective; multiobjective; type-2 fuzzy logic; workforce optimization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Employing effective optimization strategies in organizations with large workforces can have a clear impact on costs, revenues, and customer satisfaction. This is particularly true for organizations that employ large field workforces, such as utility companies. Ensuring each member of the workforce is fully utilized is a challenging problem as there are many factors that can impact the overall performance of the organization. We have developed a system that optimizes to make sure we have the right engineers, in the right place, at the right time, with the right skills. This system is currently deployed to help solve real-world optimization problems, which means there are many objectives to consider when optimizing, and there is much uncertainty in the environment. The latest version of the system uses a multiobjective genetic algorithm as its core optimization logic, with modifications such as fuzzy dominance rules (FDRs), to help overcome the issues associated with many-objective optimization. The system also utilizes genetically optimized type-2 fuzzy logic systems to better handle the uncertainty in the data and modeling. This paper shows the genetically optimized type-2 fuzzy logic systems producing better results than the crisp value implementations in our application. We also show that we can help address the weaknesses in the standard NSGA-II dominance calculations by using FDRs. The impact of this work can be measured in a number of ways; productivity benefit of 1 pound million a year, the reduction of over 2500 t of CO2 and a possible prevention of over 100 serious injuries and fatalities on the UK's roads.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据