4.8 Article

Incremental Fuzzy Clustering With Multiple Medoids for Large Data

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 1557-1568

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2014.2298244

关键词

Fuzzy clustering; incremental clustering; large data; malware clustering; multiple medoids

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Asan important technique of data analysis, clustering plays an important role in finding the underlying pattern structure embedded in unlabeled data. Clustering algorithms that need to store all the data into the memory for analysis become infeasible when the dataset is too large to be stored. To handle such large data, incremental clustering approaches are proposed. The key idea behind these approaches is to find representatives (centroids or medoids) to represent each cluster in each data chunk, which is a packet of the data, and final data analysis is carried out based on those identified representatives from all the chunks. In this paper, we propose a new incremental clustering approach called incremental multiple medoids-based fuzzy clustering (IMMFC) to handle complex patterns that are not compact and well separated. We would like to investigate whether IMMFC is a good alternative to capturing the underlying data structure more accurately. IMMFC not only facilitates the selection of multiplemedoids for each cluster in a data chunk, but also has the mechanism to make use of relationships among those identified medoids as side information to help the final data clustering process. The detailed problem formulation, updating rules derivation, and the in-depth analysis of the proposed IMMFC are provided. Experimental studies on several large datasets that include real world malware datasets have been conducted. IMMFC outperforms existing incremental fuzzy clustering approaches in terms of clustering accuracy and robustness to the order of data. These results demonstrate the great potential of IMMFC for large-data analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据