4.6 Article

Energy Distribution of Positive Charges in Gate Dielectric: Probing Technique and Impacts of Different Defects

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES
卷 60, 期 5, 页码 1745-1753

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TED.2013.2255129

关键词

Defects; energy distributions; energy profiles; instability; lifetime; negative-bias temperature instability (NBTI); positive charges in dielectrics; reliability; SiON; time-dependent variability

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Science Research Council, U.K.
  2. University of Malaya under the University Malaya High Impact Research Grant [UM.C/HIR/MOHE/ENG/19]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I012966/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/I012966/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Positive charges (PCs) in gate dielectric shift the threshold voltage and cause a time-dependent device variability. To assess their impact on circuits, it is useful to know their distribution for a wide energy range both within and beyond silicon bandgap. Such a distribution is still missing, and a technique for its extraction has not been demonstrated yet. The central objective of this paper is, for the first time, to develop a new fast technique and to demonstrate its capability for probing the energy distribution of PCs over such a wide energy range. Results show that PCs can vary significantly with energy level. The PCs in different energy regions clearly originate from different defects. The PCs below the valence band edge are as-grown hole traps that are insensitive to stress time and temperature, and substantially higher in thermal SiON. The PCs above the valence-band edge are from created defects. The PCs within the bandgap have a peak near E-v + 0.8 eV and saturate for either longer stress time or higher stress temperature. In contrast, the PCs above a conduction band edge, namely the antineutralization positive charges, do not saturate, and their generation is clearly thermally accelerated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据