4.6 Article

An Analysis of the NBTI-Induced Threshold Voltage Shift Evaluated by Different Techniques

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES
卷 56, 期 5, 页码 1086-1093

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TED.2009.2016400

关键词

Bias temperature instability; degradation; device lifetime; negative bias temperature instability (NBTI); on-the-fly (OTF); threshold voltage shift

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Negative bias temperature instability (NBTI) is limiting the lifetime of pMOSFETs, and it is often monitored by the shift of threshold voltage Delta V-t. Different techniques have been developed to extract Delta V-t, including the conventional extrapolation of the quasi-dc transfer characteristic I-d similar to V-g and the more recent extrapolation of ultrafast pulse I-d similar to V-g and the on-the-fly evaluation at stress bias. After the same stress, these techniques can produce a Delta V-t difference of up to one order of magnitude. The interpretation of this large difference is still controversial. The objective of this paper is to bridge the gap between the Delta V-t values extracted from these techniques. Degradation and recovery during measurement, measurement and truncation errors, and calculation of transconductance are all examined. After taking these factors into account, the gap in Delta V-t still cannot be filled, and hence, the effect of sensing V-g on Delta V-t must now be considered. It is found that vertical bar Delta V-t vertical bar increases with sensing vertical bar V-g vertical bar, and therefore, the popular assumption of Delta V-t being independent of sensing V is invalid. After taking both the effect of sensing Vg and recovery into account, the gap in vertical bar Delta V-t vertical bar is successfully bridged. The difference between the effect of sensing V-g and recovery is explored, and the results show that they are two different phenomena. This paper provides test engineers a method for determining the worst case Delta V-t under a given operation voltage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据