4.7 Article

Acetylated Chitosan Oligosaccharides Act as Antagonists against Glutamate-Induced PC12 Cell Death via Bcl-2/Bax Signal Pathway

期刊

MARINE DRUGS
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 1267-1289

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/md13031267

关键词

-

资金

  1. Program for National Science & Technology Support Program of China [2013BAB01B02]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [91129706, 81302811]
  3. NSFC-Shandong Joint Fund [U1406402]
  4. Special Fund for Marine Scientific Research in the Public Interest [201005024]
  5. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [ZR2011HQ012]
  6. Innovation Fund Designated for postdoc of Shandong Province [201102030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chitosan oligosaccharides (COSs), depolymerized products of chitosan composed of beta-(1 -> 4) d-glucosamine units, have broad range of biological activities such as antitumour, antifungal, and antioxidant activities. In this study, peracetylated chitosan oligosaccharides (PACOs) and N-acetylated chitosan oligosaccharides (NACOs) were prepared from the COSs by chemcal modification. The structures of these monomers were identified using NMR and ESI-MS spectra. Their antagonist effects against glutamate-induced PC12 cell death were investigated. The results showed that pretreatment of PC12 cells with the PACOs markedly inhibited glutamate-induced cell death in a concentration-dependent manner. The PACOs were better glutamate antagonists compared to the COSs and the NACOs, suggesting the peracetylation is essential for the neuroprotective effects of chitosan oligosaccharides. In addition, the PACOs pretreatment significantly reduced lactate dehydrogenase release and reactive oxygen species production. It also attenuated the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential. Further studies indicated that the PACOs inhibited glutamate-induced cell death by preventing apoptosis through depressing the elevation of Bax/Bcl-2 ratio and caspase-3 activation. These results suggest that PACOs might be promising antagonists against glutamate-induced neural cell death.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据