3.9 Article

The Role of Recrystallization in the Failure of SnAgCu Solder Interconnections Under Thermomechanical Loading

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCAPT.2010.2051268

关键词

Failure mechanism; lead-free; recrystallization; solder interconnections; thermal cycling

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [123922]
  2. Academy of Finland (AKA) [123922, 123922] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The chip scale packaged/ball grid array component boards were thermally cycled according to the IEC 68-2-14N standard (+125 degrees C/-45 degrees C, 15 min dwells, 5 min ramps). The as-solidified microstructures of Sn-rich solder interconnections were composed of relatively few, typically from two to five, large tin colonies distinguished by high-angle boundaries. However, during the thermal cycling tests the as-solidified microstructures transformed gradually into more or less equiaxed grain structure by recrystallization. It is suggested that cracking of solder interconnections under thermomechanical loadings is enhanced by the recrystallization, because the network of newly formed grain boundaries extending through the interconnections provide favorable paths for cracks to propagate intergranularly. The incubation time of recrystallization was about 50% of the average cycles-to-failure. The decrease of stored energy in high-stacking fault energy metals such as Sn takes place very effective by the recovery. Therefore, microstructures recrystallize only under restricted loading conditions: dynamic loading condition where strain hardening is more effective than recovery. Therefore, the experimentally observable transformation of the microstructures by recrystallization enables us, in principle, to correlate the field use loading conditions with those produced in accelerated reliability tests. Furthermore, the recrystallization provides the means to incorporate the effects of microstructural evolution into the lifetime prediction models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据