4.7 Article

Robust Spectrum Sensing With Crowd Sensors

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS
卷 62, 期 9, 页码 3129-3143

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCOMM.2014.2346775

关键词

Cognitive radio networks; spectrum sensing; mobile crowd sensing; data quality; data cleansing

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61172062, 61301160]
  2. Jiangsu Province Natural Science Foundation [BK2011116]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB320400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the issue of cooperative spectrum sensing with a crowd of low-end personal spectrum sensors (such as smartphones, tablets, and in-vehicle sensors), where the sensing data from crowd sensors that may be unreliable, untrustworthy, or even malicious. Moreover, due to either unexpected equipment failures or malicious behaviors, every crowd sensor could sporadically and randomly contribute with abnormal data, which makes the existing cooperative sensing schemes ineffective. To tackle these challenges, we first propose a generalized modeling approach for sensing data with an arbitrary abnormal component. Under this model, we then analyze the impact of general abnormal data on the performance of the cooperative sensing, by deriving closed-form expressions of the probabilities of global false alarm and global detection. To improve sensing data quality and enhance cooperative sensing performance, we further formulate an optimization problem as stable principal component pursuit, and develop a data cleansing-based robust spectrum sensing algorithm to solve it, where the under-utilization of licensed spectrum bands and the sparsity of nonzero abnormal data are jointly exploited to robustly cleanse out the potential nonzero abnormal data component from the original corrupted sensing data. Extensive simulation results demonstrate that the proposed robust sensing scheme performs well under various abnormal data parameter configurations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据