4.7 Article

Mechanical properties of hydrate-bearing turbidite reservoir in the first gas production test site of the Eastern Nankai Trough

期刊

MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY
卷 66, 期 -, 页码 471-486

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.02.029

关键词

Hydrate-bearing sand; Triaxial test; Pressure core; Mechanical property; Hydrate saturation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study of mechanical properties of marine sediments is essential for the prediction of the occurrence of geohazards (e.g., subsea landslides and seafloor subsidence) and the design of submarine structures for offshore industry. In this study, triaxial compression tests of gas-hydrate-bearing sandy sediments and clayey-silty sediments were conducted. The sediments were recovered by pressure coring in the Eastern Nankai Trough, the area of the first Japanese offshore production test. Soil index properties were measured and revealed porosity of 40%-50%, with porosity decreasing gradually with greater depth below the seafloor. The mean particle size was less than 10 gm for clayey-silty sediments and approximately 100 gm for sandy sediments. Permeability, estimated by a consolidation process of triaxial testing and with X-ray diffraction analysis, depended on the content of fines, which consisted chiefly of mica, kaolinite, and smectite. The results of undrained compression tests for clayey-silty sediments showed positive excess pore pressure under all test conditions. This mechanical behavior indicates that the core samples are normally consolidated sediments. Drained compression tests showed that the strength and stiffness of sandy sediments increase with hydrate saturation. Furthermore, the volumetric strain of hydrate-bearing sediments changed from compression to dilative. This result was obtained for hydrate saturation values (Sh) of more than 70%. The shear strength of hydrate-bearing turbidite sediments of the Eastern Nankai Trough is shown to be a function of the confining pressure. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据