4.7 Article

Geochemical assessment and petroleum systems in the Sinu-San Jacinto Basin, northwestern Colombia

期刊

MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY
卷 65, 期 -, 页码 217-231

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.03.022

关键词

Petroleum systems; Petroleum geochemistry; Pods of generation; Oil - oil and oil - source rock correlations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Siml-San Jacinto Basin (SSJB), onshore and offshore, has abundant oil and gas manifestations, evidencing the existence of various petroleum systems. The onshore oils can be separated into at least two families. The first one (Oil Family I) is derived from source rocks deposited in anoxic marine platform, and the other one (Oil Family II) is derived from source rocks deposited in deltaic marine environment with high input of terrestrial organic matter. Also there are heavy biodegrated oil seeps as well as oil seeps possibly derived from others organic facies, a troublesome to classify with the available data. Regarding source rock correlations, Cansona Formation bitumens exhibit good correlation with the Oil Family I, and Cienaga de Oro Formation extracts exhibit some correlation with oils from the Oil Family II. There are also some oils seeps (onshore and offshore) on which there is no conclusive information about its origin. About the gases, their isotopic and molecular composition, indicate that some are biogenic and others thermogenic, as well as others are mixtures biogenic/thermogenic. Onshore and offshore SSJB were recognized three (3) kitchens or pods of generation with oil generation and expulsion determined by geochemical modeling at depths greater than 12000 feet. Associated with each one of the three kitchens, have been postulated the petroleum systems Cansona - San Cayetano (.), and Cienaga de Oro - Cienaga de Oro (.). Additionally in the southern onshore pod could be postulated a speculative petroleum system, the Precansona - Precansona (?) Petroleum System. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据