4.7 Article

Distributed Higher Order Consensus Protocols in Multiagent Dynamical Systems

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCSI.2011.2106032

关键词

Algebraic graph theory; consensus region; higher order consensus; leader-follower control; multiagent system

资金

  1. NSFC-HKRGC [N-CityU107/07]
  2. DAAD Scholarship (Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst Dienst) [423]
  3. German Science Foundation (DFG) [SFB 555]
  4. National Science Foundation [ECCS-0748287]
  5. Australian Research Council
  6. Directorate For Engineering [1213291] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Directorate For Engineering
  8. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys [0748287] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys [1213291] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper studies general higher order distributed consensus protocols in multiagent dynamical systems. First, network synchronization is investigated, with some necessary and sufficient conditions derived for higher order consensus. It is found that consensus can be reached if and only if all subsystems are asymptotically stable. Based on this result, consensus regions are characterized. It is proved that for the mth-order consensus, there are at most left perpendicular(m + 1)/2right perpendicular disconnected stable and unstable consensus regions. It is shown that consensus can be achieved if and only if all the nonzero eigenvalues of the Laplacian matrix lie in the stable consensus regions. Moreover, the ratio of the largest to the smallest nonzero eigenvalues of the Laplacian matrix plays a key role in reaching consensus and a scheme for choosing the coupling strength is derived. Furthermore, a leader-follower control problem in multiagent dynamical systems is considered, which reveals that to reach consensus the agents with very small degrees must be informed. Finally, simulation examples are given to illustrate the theoretical analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据