4.6 Article

Melanoma Recognition in Dermoscopy Images via Aggregated Deep Convolutional Features

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
卷 66, 期 4, 页码 1006-1016

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2018.2866166

关键词

Dermoscopy image; melanoma recognition; residual network; fisher vector; deep learning

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81571758, 61871274, 61801305, 61501305, 81771922]
  2. National Key Research and Develop Program [2016YFC0104703]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2017A030313377, 2016A030313047]
  4. Shenzhen Peacock Plan [KQTD2016053112051497]
  5. Shenzhen Key Basic Research Project [JCYJ20170818142347251, JCYJ20170818094109846]
  6. Hong Kong RGC General Research Fund [PolyU152035/17E]
  7. National Taipei University of Technology-Shenzhen University Joint Research Program [2018006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we present a novel framework for dermoscopy image recognition via both a deep learning method and a local descriptor encoding strategy. Specifically, deep representations of a rescaled dermoscopy image are first extracted via a very deep residual neural network pretrained on a large natural image dataset. Then these local deep descriptors are aggregated by orderless visual statistic features based on Fisher vector (FV) encoding to build a global image representation. Finally, the FV encoded representations are used to classify melanoma images using a support vector machine with a Chi-squared kernel. Our proposed method is capable of generating more discriminative features to deal with large variations within melanoma classes, as well as small variations between melanoma and nonmelanoma classes with limited training data. Extensive experiments are performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method. Comparisons with state-of-the-art methods show the superiority of our method using the publicly available ISBI 2016 Skin lesion challenge dataset.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据