4.6 Article

Image Texture in Dental Panoramic Radiographs as a Potential Biomarker of Osteoporosis

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
卷 60, 期 9, 页码 2384-2392

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2256908

关键词

Co-occurrence matrices; dental panoramic radiograph (DPR); image texture; osteoporosis; random forest classifier

资金

  1. Dunhill Trust
  2. European Commission (Osteodent) [QLK6-2002-02243]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies have shown an association between osteoporosis and automatic measurements of mandibular cortical width on dental panoramic radiographs (DPRs). In this study, we show that additional image texture features increase this association and propose the combined features as a potential biomarker for osteoporosis. We used an existing dataset of 663 DPRs of female patients with bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. The mandibular cortex was located using a previously described computer algorithm. Texture features, based on co-occurrence matrices and fractal dimension, were measured in the bone within the cortex and also in the superior basal bone above the cortex. These, augmented by cortical width measurements, were used by a random forest classifier to identify osteoporosis at femoral neck, total hip, and lumbar spine. Classification performance was assessed by ROC analysis. Area-under-curve (AUC) values for identifying osteoporosis at femoral neck were 0.830, 0.824, and 0.872 using, respectively, cortical width alone, cortical texture (co-occurrence matrix features) alone, and combined width and texture. At 80% sensitivity, these classifiers produced specificity values of 74.4%, 73.6%, and 80.0%, respectively. Fractal dimension was a less effective texture feature. Prediction of osteoporosis at the lumbar spine was poorer, but a combined width and superior basal bone texture classifier gave a significant improvement in AUC at p < 0.05 over the use of width alone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据