4.6 Article

Entropy-based optimization of wavelet spatial filters

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
卷 55, 期 3, 页码 914-922

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2007.906509

关键词

motor unit; selectivity; spatial filtering; surface electromyography (EMG); wavelet design

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new class of spatial filters for surface electromyographic (EMG) signal detection is proposed. These filters are based on the 2-D spatial wavelet decomposition of the surface EMG recorded with a grid of electrodes and inverse transformation after zeroing a subset of the transformation coefficients. The filter transfer function depends on the selected mother wavelet in the two spatial directions. Wavelet parameterization is proposed with the aim of signal-based optimization of the transfer function of the spatial filter. The optimization criterion was the minimization of the entropy of the time samples of the output signal. The optimized spatial filter is linear and space invariant. In simulated and experimental recordings, the optimized wavelet filter showed increased selectivity with respect to previously proposed filters. For example, in simulation, the ratio between the peak-to-peak amplitude of action potentials generated by motor units 20 degrees apart in the transversal direction was 8.58% (with monopolar recording), 2.47% (double differential), 2.59% (normal double differential), and 0.47% (optimized wavelet filter). In experimental recordings, the duration of the detected action potentials decreased from (mean +/- SD) 6.9 +/- 0.3 ms (monopolar recording), to 4.5 +/- 0.2 ms (normal double differential), 3.7 +/- 0.2 ms (double differential), and 3.0 +/- 0.1 ms (optimized wavelet filter). In conclusion, the new class of spatial filters with the proposed signal-based optimization of the transfer function allows better discrimination of individual motor unit activities in surface EMG recordings than it was previously possible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据