4.6 Article

Cell Contour Tracking and Data Synchronization for Real-Time, High-Accuracy Micropipette Aspiration

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TASE.2009.2021356

关键词

Cell contour visual tracking; high accuracy; micropipette aspiration; precise data synchronization

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents an automated cell contour visual measurement technique and a data synchronization mechanism for real-time, high-accuracy mechanical characterization of individual cells with micropipette aspiration. A computer vision tracking algorithm is developed for automatically measuring cell deformation parameters in real time (30 Hz) with a resolution down to 0.21 pixel, significantly enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of micropipette aspiration. To achieve a high characterization accuracy, the cell deformations and applied pressure changes are precisely synchronized using a data synchronization mechanism. Experimental results on both solid-like cells (interstitial cells) and liquid-like cells (neutrophils) quantitatively demonstrate that the visual tracking algorithm is capable of Significantly increasing the efficiency and accuracy of micropipette aspiration. Among several characterized mechanical parameters, the viscoelastic properties of porcine aortic valve interstitial cells were, for the first time, quantified in this study. Note to Practitioners-Micropipette aspiration is a widely used technique for characterizing mechanical properties of individual biological cells. Automated cell contour measurements can prove very useful for users of micropipette aspiration to avoid hours of laborious postprocessing, which is necessary with existing systems. Furthermore, compared with manual measurements, sub-pixel tracking of cell deformation parameters leads to a higher accuracy in quantifying cell mechanical properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据