4.7 Article

Communication-Aware Motion Planning in Mobile Networks

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL
卷 56, 期 10, 页码 2478-2485

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2011.2164033

关键词

Communication-aware target tracking; mobile sensor networks; probabilistic channel learning

资金

  1. ARO CTA MAST [W911NF-08-2-0004]
  2. NSF [0812338]
  3. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  4. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [0812338] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this technical note, we propose a communication-aware motion planning framework to increase the probability that a robot maintains its connectivity to a fixed station, while accomplishing a sensing task, in realistic communication environments. We use a probabilistic multi-scale model for channel characterization. Using this model, we propose a probabilistic framework for assessing the spatial variations of a wireless channel, based on a small number of measurements. We then show how our channel learning framework can be utilized for devising communication-aware motion planning strategies. We first present communication-aware objective functions that can plan the trajectory of the robot in order to improve its online channel assessment in an environment. We then propose a communication-aware target tracking approach for the case where a fixed station utilizes a robot (or a number of them) to keep track of the position of amoving target. In this approach, probabilistic channel assessment metrics are combined with sensing goals, when controlling the motion, in order to increase the amount of information that the fixed station receives about the target. Finally, we show the performance of our framework, using both real and simulated channel measurements. Overall, our results indicate that networked robotic operations can benefit considerably from our probabilistic channel assessment and its integration with sensing/motion planning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据