4.5 Article

Walsh-Ordered Hadamard Time-Encoded Pseudocontinuous ASL (WH pCASL)

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 76, 期 6, 页码 1814-1824

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26078

关键词

magnetic resonance imaging; arterial spin labeling; Hadamard encoded; time encoded; Walsh ordering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Walsh ordering of Hadamard encoding-matrices and an additional averaging strategy are proposed for Hadamard-encoded pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling (H-pCASL). In contrast to conventional H-pCASL the proposed method generates more perfusion-weighted images which are accessible already during a running experiment and even from incomplete sets of encoded images. Theory: Walsh-ordered Hadamard matrices consist of fully decodable Hadamard submatrices. At any time during a measurement these submatrices may yield perfusion-weighted images, even at runtime and with incomplete datasets. The usage of an additional so-called mirrored matrix for averaging leads to more decodable subboli. Methods: Perfusion-weighted images (five healthy volunteers) are generated using both a Walsh-ordered and a corresponding mirrored Hadamard matrix. To test their correctness they are compared with equivalent images from conventional multi postlabeling-delay (PLD) pCASL-measurements. Results: All predicted perfusion-weighted images could be generated and correlated very well with multi-PLD images. Already small subsets of encoded images, acquired early during the measurement, yielded perfusion-weighted images. The mirrored matrix generates more perfusion-weighted images without time penalty. Conclusion: Early access to perfusion-weighted images despite incomplete datasets allows dynamic adaptation of parameters and increases robustness against artifacts. Thus, the approach may be well suited for clinical applications, where pathologies demand rapid parameter adaptation and increase the chance of artifacts. (C) 2015 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据