4.4 Article

Abnormalities of the uncinate fasciculus correlate with executive dysfunction in patients with left temporal lobe epilepsy

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
卷 33, 期 5, 页码 544-550

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2015.02.011

关键词

Temporal lobe epilepsy; Cognition; Uncinate fasciculus; Diffusion tensor imaging

资金

  1. China National Natural Sciences Foundation [81360202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate executive deficits in patients with left temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and to analyze the association of executive deficits and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters of the uncinate fasciculus. Methods: This study included 14 adult left TIE patients and 15 healthy controls. Executive function was examined using neuropsychological tests, including the Stroop color-word, digit span, digit symbol, trail-making test and verbal fluency tests. All subjects underwent brain DTI. Results: Compared with controls, TLE patients needed significantly more time (P = 0.036) and had more wrong answers (P < 0.001) in the Stroop test, and exhibited significantly lower scores in the digit span (P = 0.017), digit symbol (P = 0.009), and verbal fluency (P = 0.001) tests. Additionally, TLE patients took significantly longer to accomplish the trail-making test (P = 0.042). Fractional anisotropy (FA) of the left uncinate fasciculus in TLE patients was significantly lower compared to controls (P < 0.001). FA of the left uncinate fasciculus in TLE patients and controls positively correlated with verbal fluency (r = 0.565, P = 0.035; r = 0.561, P = 0.031) and digit span (r = 0.556, P = 0.039; r = 0.559, P = 0.030) test scores. Conclusions: Patients with left TLE exhibit wide ranges of executive deficits. Abnormal FA values in the left UF ipsilateral to the epileptogenic zone suggest that disrupted integrity in the left uncinate fasciculus is related to executive deficits in patients with left TLE. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据