4.2 Article

Transversus abdominis plane block vs. wound infiltration in Caesarean section: a randomised controlled trial

期刊

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
卷 59, 期 4, 页码 496-504

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/aas.12498

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundMultiple studies suggest that transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block (without intrathecal morphine) after Caesarean section (CS) reduces post-operative morphine consumption. In our study, we wanted to compare the analgesic effect of TAP block with infiltration of the wound after CS. MethodsWe included 60 pregnant women scheduled for elective CS under spinal anaesthesia in a randomised, single-centre, double-blind study. Thirty patients received ultrasound-guided TAP block using 20ml bupivacaine 0.25% with adrenaline 5g/ml bilaterally and 20ml normal saline as wound infiltration (TAP group). The other 30 patients (the control group) received normal saline 20ml bilaterally in the TAP, and 20ml bupivacaine 0.25% with adrenaline 5g/ml as wound infiltration. The main outcome was cumulative morphine consumption at 48h after surgery. In addition, continuous morphine consumption, pain scores and side effects were registered. ResultsFifty-seven patients completed the study. Cumulative morphine consumption at 48h (meanstandard deviation) was 41 +/- 34mg in the TAP group and 38 +/- 27mg in the control group (P=0.7); a difference of 3mg (95% confidence interval -13 to 19mg). Morphine consumption at any time up to 48h was virtually identical in both groups. Side effects were similar, except for a higher degree of sedation in the TAP group (P=0.04). ConclusionCompared with wound infiltration with local anaesthetics, TAP block did not reduce cumulative morphine consumption following CS. The TAP block was associated with more pronounced sedation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据