4.7 Article

On Optimal Scheduling in Duty-Cycled Industrial IoT Applications Using IEEE802.15.4e TSCH

期刊

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 3655-3666

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2013.2266417

关键词

IoT architecture; IoT standardization; WSN; sensor communication protocol; IEEE802.15.4e; energy efficiency; time synchronized channel hopping; duty cycle

资金

  1. European Community
  2. PON [ERMES-01-03113, DSS-01-02499, EURO6-01-02238]
  3. Italian MIUR
  4. [VITRO-257245]
  5. [EXALTED-258512]
  6. [OUTSMART-285038]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As exposed in a recent report by General Electric, an industrial Internet of Things (IoT) is emerging as a commercially viable embodiment of the IoT where physical sensors gather data readings from the field and deliver the traffic to the Internet. The collected real-time big data, in turn, allow the optimizing of entire industry verticals with enormous return of investments. Although opportunities are ample, it comes along with serious engineering design challenges as industrial applications have stringent requirements on delay, lifetime and standards-compliance. To this end, we advocate the use of an IEEE/IETF standardized IoT architecture along with a recently introduced data-centric scheduling algorithm known as traffic aware scheduling algorithm (TASA). Applying graph theoretical tools to the multi-channel, time-synchronized, and duty-cycled nature of TASA, we rigorously derive optimality and bounds on the minimum number of needed active slots (impacting end-to-end delays) and the network duty-cycle (impacting lifetime). We demonstrate the enormous superiority of TASA over traditional IEEE802.15.4/ZigBee approaches in terms of energy efficiency. The outcome of this paper is currently to lay foundations of the recently formed IETF standardization group 6TSCH with the aim to significantly improve IoT data flows over IEEE802.15.4e TSCH and IETF 6LoWPAN/ROLL enabled technologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据