4.7 Article

Abdominal Infection Suppresses the Number and Activity of Intrahepatic Natural Killer Cells and Promotes Tumor Growth in a Murine Liver Metastasis Model

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 23, 期 -, 页码 257-265

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4466-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H04315] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing evidence suggests that postoperative infection is associated with poorer long-term outcome in various malignancies. However, the mechanism of poor prognosis induced by postoperative infection has not been clearly explained. We sought to determine whether abdominal infection promotes cancer metastases in a murine liver metastasis model, and to investigate the role of liver natural killer (NK) cells on antitumor immunity during abdominal infection. Female BALB/c (8-10 weeks old) mice were inoculated with NL-17 colon cancer cells into the spleen and then subjected to abdominal infection induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) or sham treatment. The extent of liver metastases and cytokine production in the serum and liver were investigated. Cell fraction and cytotoxic activities of liver mononuclear cells (MNCs) were elucidated. CLP mice had poorer survival and their serum levels of IL-6, -10, and -12p70 were significantly elevated on day 1 compared with sham-treated and control mice. No obvious differences in cytokine levels of the liver homogenates were identified among the three groups, except IL-12p70 levels in CLP mice on day 7 significantly decreased. The cytotoxic activities of liver MNCs were significantly suppressed in CLP mice soon after tumor inoculation. Flow cytometry revealed a decrease in NK cells in the liver and perforin and granzyme B expression levels. Abdominal infection promoted liver metastases in a murine liver metastasis model, which may be partially caused by a decrease in the number and activity of NK cells during abdominal infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据