4.7 Article

Learning classification models of cognitive conditions from subtle behaviors in the digital Clock Drawing Test

期刊

MACHINE LEARNING
卷 102, 期 3, 页码 393-441

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10994-015-5529-5

关键词

Medical scoring systems; Clock Drawing Test; Cognitive impairment diagnostics; Interpretable machine learning; Machine learning applications

资金

  1. Robert E. Wise Research and Education Institution
  2. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency [D13AP00008]
  3. National Science Foundation [IIS-1404494]
  4. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [R01-NS17950, K23-NS60660, R01-NS082386]
  5. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [N01-HC25195]
  6. National Institutes on Aging [R01 AG0333040, AG16492, AG08122]
  7. National Institute on Mental Health [RO1-MH073989]
  8. IH/NCATS Clinical and Translational Science Award [UL1TR000064]
  9. University of Florida Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration
  10. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  11. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [GRANTS:13912691] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  12. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems
  13. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1053407] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Clock Drawing Test-a simple pencil and paper test-has been used for more than 50 years as a screening tool to differentiate normal individuals from those with cognitive impairment, and has proven useful in helping to diagnose cognitive dysfunction associated with neurological disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and other dementias and conditions. We have been administering the test using a digitizing ballpoint pen that reports its position with considerable spatial and temporal precision, making available far more detailed data about the subject's performance. Using pen stroke data from these drawings categorized by our software, we designed and computed a large collection of features, then explored the tradeoffs in performance and interpretability in classifiers built using a number of different subsets of these features and a variety of different machine learning techniques. We used traditional machine learning methods to build prediction models that achieve high accuracy. We operationalized widely used manual scoring systems so that we could use them as benchmarks for our models. We worked with clinicians to define guidelines for model interpretability, and constructed sparse linear models and rule lists designed to be as easy to use as scoring systems currently used by clinicians, but more accurate. While our models will require additional testing for validation, they offer the possibility of substantial improvement in detecting cognitive impairment earlier than currently possible, a development with considerable potential impact in practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据