4.7 Article

Comparison of pH effects on ohmic heating and conventional heating for inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium and Listeria monocytogenes in orange juice

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 64, 期 2, 页码 860-866

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.06.056

关键词

Ohmic heating; pH; Electrical conductivity; Food-borne pathogens; Conventional heating

资金

  1. Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Research Center Support Program, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Republic of Korea
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [NRF-2012M3A2A1051679]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of the current study is to identify the influence of acidity on ohmic heating compared to conventional heating for inactivation of food-borne pathogens in orange juice. For conventional heating, the heating rate was not significantly different (P > 0.05) regardless of pH and pathogens were inactivated more effectively at lower pH. However, different patterns were observed for ohmic heating. Although temperature and electrical conductivity were not greatly affected by lowering pH, temperature increased more rapidly with increasing pH due to higher electrical conductivity. Also, the inactivation patterns were significantly different (P < 0.05) from conventional heating. While Salmonella Typhimurium was inactivated most rapidly at pH 2.5, E'scherichia coil O157:H7 and Listeria monocytogenes were inactivated most rapidly at pH 4.5. When pathogens were exposed to each heating method at a fixed temperature, additional effects of ohmic heating were not observed. Also, the overall quality of orange juice subjected to ohmic heating was not greatly affected at any pH level. Therefore, increasing as well as lowering pH can also be considered effective ways to optimize pasteurization of orange juice when using ohmic heating. The different characteristics of ohmic heating compared to conventional heating indicate the necessity of a new approach. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据