4.7 Article

Carrier element-free coprecipitation and speciation of inorganic tin in beverage samples and total tin in food samples using N-Benzoyl-N,N-diisobutylthiourea and its determination by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 63, 期 2, 页码 1091-1096

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.04.025

关键词

Tin speciation; Coprecipitation; N-Benzoyl-N,N-diisobutylthiourea; Graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry; Beverage and food samples

资金

  1. Unit of the Scientific Research Projects of Gaziosmanpasa University [2010/62]
  2. Turkish Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new, simple, rapid and selective separation, preconcentration and speciation of Sn(II) and Sn(IV) has been developed. The procedure is based on coprecipitation of Sn(II) on N-Benzoyl-N,N-diisobutylthiourea without carrier element. While Sn(II) can be quantitatively precipitated on N-Benzoyl-N,N-diisobutylthiourea in the pH range of 8.0-9.0, recovery of Sn(IV) was below 10%. Total tin was determined after the reduction of Sn(IV) to Sn(II) with 0.1 M NaBH4 in 1 M NaOH solution. Sn(IV) concentrations were calculated as difference between total tin and Sn(II). Determination of tin concentrations was performed by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS). Various analytical parameters including pH, amount of precipitant, sample volume, etc. were optimized. The effects of matrix ions were also examined. Enrichment factor was found as 50. The relative standard deviation was 5%. The detection limit was found 0.013 mu g L-1 for Sn(II). The validation of this method was performed by using certificate reference materials (NIST SRM 1568a Rice flour and NRCC DORM-2 Dogfish muscle). Optimized method was applied to bottled mineral water, soda and ice tea samples for tin speciation. This procedure was also applied to microwave digested food samples for the determination of total tin. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据