4.7 Article

Critical Nitrogen Curve and Remote Detection of Nitrogen Nutrition Index for Corn in the Northwestern Plain of Shandong Province, China

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2012.2236302

关键词

Critical nitrogen curve; NNI; remote sensing

资金

  1. Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [201003002]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environment Information System of China [O8R8B670KA]
  3. Key Project for the Strategic Science Plan of IGSNRR, CAS [2012ZD010]
  4. Research Plan of LREIS [O88RA900KA]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41071276]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The nitrogen nutrition index (NNI) is calculated from the measured N concentration and the critical nitrogen (N) curve. It can be used to determine the N required by a crop and is helpful for optimizing N application in the field. Our objectives were to validate the existing corn critical N curve for the northwestern plain of Shandong Province and to design a more accurate remote detection method for the NNI. For this purpose, field measurements were conducted weekly to acquire the biomass and N concentrations during the corn growing season of 2011. Additionally, nearly 60 corn canopy spectra were collected during field campaigns. First, limiting and non-limiting N points were selected from sampled data, and they were used to validate the existing critical N curve. Second, an NNI estimation model based on a Principal Component Analysis method and Back Propagation Artificial Neural Network (PCA-BP-ANN) model was established. The collected canopy spectra and corresponding NNI were used to compare the performances of the above mentioned method and other for NNI estimation. The results showed that the N curve proposed in the literature is suitable for the study region. Among the three remote detection methods, PCA-BP-ANN provided the best results with highest R-2 value and lowest root mean square error value.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据