4.7 Article

Parietal Peritoneum as an Autologous Substitute for Venous Reconstruction in Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGERY
卷 262, 期 2, 页码 366-371

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000959

关键词

liver resection; pancreatic resection; parietal peritoneum; vascular graft; vascular reconstruction

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the parietal peritoneum (PP) as an autologous substitute for venous reconstruction during hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery. Background: Venous resection during liver or pancreatic resection may require a rapidly available substitute especially when the need for venous resection is unforeseen. Methods: The PP was used as an autologous substitute during complex liver and pancreatic resections. Postoperative anticoagulation was standard and venous patency was assessed by routine computed tomographic scans. Results: Thirty patients underwent vascular resection during pancreatic (n = 18) or liver (n = 12) resection, mainly for malignant tumors (n = 29). Venous resection was an emergency procedure in 4 patients due to prolonged vascular occlusion. The PP, with a mean length of 22 mm (15-70), was quickly harvested and used as a lateral (n = 28) or a tubular (n = 2) substitute for reconstruction of the mesentericoportal vein (n = 24), vena cava (n = 3), or hepatic vein (n = 3). Severe morbidity included Clavien grade-III complications in 4 (13%) patients but there was no PP-related or hemorrhagic complications. Histological vascular invasion was present in 18 (62%) patients, and all had an R0 resection (100%). After a mean follow-up of 14 (7-33) months, all venous reconstructions were patent except for 1 tubular graft (97%). Conclusions: A PP can be safely used as a lateral patch for venous reconstruction during HPB surgery; this could help reduce reluctance to perform vascular resection when oncologically required. Clinical trials identification: NCT02121886.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据