4.7 Article

Can Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Prevent Recurrent Idiopathic Acute Pancreatitis? A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGERY
卷 262, 期 5, 页码 736-741

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001469

关键词

acute pancreatitis; laparoscopic cholecystectomy; lipid-lowering drugs; microlithiasis

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective:The aim of the present trial was to ascertain whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCC) can prevent recurrent attacks of idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP).Summary:Up to 50% to 75% of IAP may be due to microlithiasis, which is undetectable by conventional imaging methods.Methods:This randomized, prospective trial included 85 patients (39 in the LCC and 46 in the control group) in 8 hospitals in Finland. We included adult patients (over 18 years) with their first attack of IAP. The diagnosis of IAP was based on the exclusion of common etiological reasons for acute pancreatitis (AP), whereafter the patients were randomized into conservative watchful waiting (controls) or LCC group. The primary end point was the number of patients with recurrent AP during the follow-up. All recurrent attacks of AP after an initial IAP episode were registered.Results:During a median follow-up of 36 (5-58) months, the recurrence of IAP was significantly higher in the control group than in LCC group (14/46 vs. 4/39, P=0.016), as was also the number of recurrences (23/46 vs. 8/39, P=0.003). In the subgroup of patients with at least 24 months' follow-up, the recurrence was still higher among controls (14/37 vs. 4/35, P=0.008). In patients with normal liver function, recurrence was also significantly higher in the control than in the LCC group (13/46 vs. 4/39, P=0.026). During surgery, 23/39 (59%) of the gallbladders were found to contain biliary stones or sludge.Conclusions:LCC can effectively prevent the recurrence of IAP when all other possible etiologies of pancreatitis are carefully excluded. A total of 5 patients needed to be treated (NNT-value) to prevent 1 IAP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据