4.6 Article

Interfacial-Layer-Driven Dielectric Degradation and Breakdown of HfSiON/SiON Gate Dielectric nMOSFETs

期刊

IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS
卷 32, 期 10, 页码 1319-1321

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LED.2011.2161861

关键词

HfSiON; high-k dielectric; interfacial layer (IL); positive bias temperature instability (BTI) (PBTI); reliability; SiON; stress-induced leakage current (SILC); time-dependent dielectric breakdown (TDDB)

资金

  1. BK21 Program
  2. System IC 2010 Project
  3. National Center for Nanomaterials Technology
  4. World Class University
  5. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology through the National Research Foundation of Korea [R31-10100]
  6. Korea Institute of Industrial Technology(KITECH) [B0000055] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  7. National Research Foundation of Korea [R31-2011-000-10100-0, 과C6A1609] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This letter describes the dielectric degradation and breakdown characteristics of HfSiON/SiON gate dielectric nMOSFETs using the stress-induced leakage current (SILC) analysis. The nMOSFETs show progressive breakdown (PBD) under substrate injection stress, and its characteristic changes as the stress voltage increases, from slow PBD (s-PBD) only, then to a combination of s-PBD and fast PBD (f-PBD), and finally to f-PBD only. It is found that the SILC of nMOSFETs is caused by trap-assisted tunneling mainly through the preexisting deep traps of the high-k layer and the stress-induced traps of the interfacial layer (IL). The stress-induced defects under substrate injection stress are generated within the IL rather than the high-k layer, and the time-dependent dielectric breakdown of the nMOSFETs is driven by the degradation of the IL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据