4.7 Article

Circulating Tumor Cells as a Biomarker for Preoperative Prognostic Staging in Patients With Esophageal Cancer

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGERY
卷 261, 期 6, 页码 1124-1130

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001130

关键词

CellSearch; circulating tumor cells; esophageal cancer; staging; surgery

类别

资金

  1. Hamburger Stiftung zur Foerderung der Krebsbekampfung
  2. B. Braun-Stiftung
  3. European Research Council, Brussels, (Advanced Investigator grant DISSECT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: We evaluated the prognostic significance of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in patients with esophageal cancer (EC). Background: Despite the availability of several preoperative diagnostic techniques, accurate pretreatment staging of EC remains challenging. Methods: In this single-center, prospective study, peripheral blood samples for CTC analyses were obtained preoperatively from 100 patients who were judged to have resectable EC. CTC detection was performed using the CellSearch System. Data were correlated with clinicopathological parameters and patient outcomes. Results: CTCs were detected in 18% (18/100) of all eligible patients. Patients with CTCs showed significantly shorter relapse-free (P < 0.001) and overall survival (P < 0.001) than CTC-negative patients. Even in patients with lymph node invasion and without distant metastases (pN+, M0, N = 45), CTC detection indicated significantly worse relapse-free (P < 0.001) and overall survival (P = 0.007). Multivariate analyses of eligible patients identified CTCs as a strong, independent, prognostic indicator of tumor recurrence (hazard ratio, 5.063; 95% confidence interval, 2.233-11.480; P < 0.001) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 3.128; 95% confidence interval, 1.492-6.559; P = 0.003). Conclusions: This is the first study to report that CTCs detected by an automated immunomagnetic detection system are independent, prognostic indicators of patients' outcome in EC. Thus, implementation of CTCs may improve accuracy of preoperative staging in EC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据