4.6 Article

Krill biomass and aggregation structure in relation to tidal cycle in a penguin foraging region off the Western Antarctic Peninsula

期刊

ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE
卷 70, 期 4, 页码 834-849

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fst088

关键词

acoustics; Adlie penguin; aggregation structure; Antarctic krill; distribution patterns

资金

  1. NSF Office of Polar Programs [OPP-0823101]
  2. Division Of Polar Programs
  3. Directorate For Geosciences [1344502] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Office of Polar Programs (OPP)
  5. Directorate For Geosciences [1440435] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antarctic krill are a key component of the diet of Adlie penguins inhabiting the Western Antarctic Peninsula (WAP), yet our understanding of the variability of krill distribution patterns within nearshore penguin feeding grounds is limited. A recent study of the foraging patterns of penguins breeding in the northern WAP suggests that tidal phase plays a role in foraging distance. We used acoustics to examine biomass and aggregation structure of krill in the penguin foraging grounds off Palmer Station during diurnal and semi-diurnal tides. Nearshore, integrated krill biomass during diurnal tides was significantly higher than during semi-diurnal tides. Krill aggregations were also shallower, closer together, and larger in dimension during diurnal tides. Conversely, krill aggregations had higher volumetric biomass and abundance during semi-diurnal tides. Further offshore, at the head of the Palmer Deep canyon, krill aggregations were similar to those observed nearshore during diurnal tides (i.e. shallow, close together, and large in dimension). Since krill aggregation structure strongly influences availability as a potential prey source, we suggest that foraging behavior of Adlie penguins in this region is strongly linked to the variability in nearshore krill aggregation structure as well as biomass.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据