4.6 Article

Applicability of the trophic index TRIX in two transitional ecosystems: the Mar Menor lagoon (Spain) and the Mondego estuary (Portugal)

期刊

ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE
卷 65, 期 8, 页码 1442-1448

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsn123

关键词

ecological indicators; eutrophication; trophic index

资金

  1. Respuesta de la red trofica de una laguna costera a las entradas de nutrientes (EUTROCOST)
  2. Efeitos dos caudais duciaquicolas sobre as comunidades de invertebrados macrobentonicos, na perspectiva da avaliacao da qualidade ecologica dos estuarios (EFICAS) [POCI/MAR/61324/2004]
  3. Sustainable management of Mediterranean coastal fresh and transitional water bodies (WADI) [INCO-CT-2005-015226]
  4. FCT ( Portuguese National Board of Scientific Research) [SFRH/BD/24430/2005]
  5. Instituto da Agua (Portugal)
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/24430/2005, POCI/MAR/61324/2004] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ecological indicators are commonly used to provide synoptic information about the state of ecosystems. Their main attribute is that they combine a range of environmental factors in a single value, which is thought useful for management and for making ecological-quality concepts easily understandable by the general public. In some European countries, the trophic state of marine and coastal waters is characterized using the trophic index TRIX. We used TRIX in the studies of the Mar Menor coastal lagoon ( southeast Spain) and the Mondego estuary ( northwest Portugal). These areas are under environmental stress, and eutrophication processes have been monitored in recent years. The results demonstrate the inefficacy of TRIX as a trustworthy tool to classify eutrophication status in estuarine waters. The causes of the malfunction of the index are discussed, and we suggest that, if the index is to be applied over wide areas, the classification criteria will have to be adapted to specific environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据