4.5 Article

Conjugate observations of Saturn's northern and southern H3+ aurorae

期刊

ICARUS
卷 229, 期 -, 页码 214-220

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2013.11.009

关键词

Saturn; Aurorae; Magnetosphere; Ionosphere; Aeronomy

资金

  1. Royal Astronomical Society Research Fellowship
  2. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC)
  3. STFC [ST/G002223/1, ST/I505780/1, ST/H002480/1, ST/K001000/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H002480/1, ST/G002223/1, ST/I505780/1, ST/K001000/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present an analysis of recent high spatial and spectral resolution ground-based infrared observations of HI obtained with the 10-m Keck II telescope in April 2011. We observed H-3' emission from Saturn's northern and southern auroral regions, simultaneously, over the course of more than 2 h, obtaining spectral images along the central meridian as Saturn rotated. Previous ground-based work has derived only an average temperature of an individual polar region, summing an entire night of observations. Here we analyse 20 H-3(+) spectra, 10 for each hemisphere, providing H-3(+) temperature, column density and total emission in both the northern and southern polar regions simultaneously, improving on past results in temporal cadence and simultaneity. We find that: (1) the average thermospheric temperatures are 527 18 K in northern Spring and 583 +/- 13 K in southern Autumn, respectively; (2) this asymmetry in temperature is likely to be the result of an inversely proportional relationship between the total thermospheric heating rate Uoule heating and ion drag) and magnetic field strength - i.e. the larger northern field strength leads to reduced total heating rate and a reduced temperature, irrespective of season, and (3) this implies that thermospheric heating and temperatures are relatively insensitive to seasonal effects. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据