4.7 Article

Effects of Curative Colorectal Cancer Surgery on Exhaled Volatile Organic Compounds and Potential Implications in Clinical Follow-up

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGERY
卷 262, 期 5, 页码 862-867

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001471

关键词

breath analysis; colorectal cancer; follow-up; metabolomics; screening; volatile organic compounds

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective:The aim of this study was to determine whether the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) pattern in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is modified by curative surgery for a potential application in the oncologic follow-up.Background:CRC has been proved to induce metabolic derangements detectable by high through-output techniques in exhaled breath showing a specific pattern of VOCs.Methods:Forty-eight CRC patients and 55 healthy controls (HC) entered the study. Thirty-two patients (M/F: 1.4; mean age 63 years) attended the oncologic follow-up (mean 24 months) and were found disease-free. Breath samples were collected under similar environmental conditions into a Tedlar bags and processed offline by thermal-desorption gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (TD-GC-MS). VOCs were selected by U test to build a Probabilistic Neural Network (PNN) model to set-up a training phase, which was cross-validated using the leave-one out method.Results:A total of 11 VOCs were finally selected for their excellent discriminant performance in identifying disease-free patients in follow-up from CRC patients before surgery, (sensitivity 100%, specificity 97.92%, accuracy 98.75%, and AUC: 1). The same VOCs pattern discriminated follow-up patients from HC, with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 90.91%, accuracy of 94.25%, and AUC 0.959.Conclusions:Exhaled VOCs pattern from CRC patients is modified by cancer removal confirming the tight relationship between tumor metabolism and exhaled VOCs. PNN analysis provides a high discriminatory tool to identify patients disease-free after curative surgery suggesting potential implications in CRC screening and secondary prevention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据