4.5 Article

Heavy ion escape from Mars, influence from solar wind conditions and crustal magnetic fields

期刊

ICARUS
卷 215, 期 2, 页码 475-484

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2011.08.003

关键词

Ionospheres; Mars, Atmosphere; Solar wind

资金

  1. Swedish National Space Board
  2. Swedish Research Council
  3. National Graduate School of Space Technology, Lulea University of Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have used more than 4 years of Mars Express ion data to estimate the escape of heavy ions (O-1(+) O-2(+) and CO2+) from Mars. To take the limited field of view of the instrument into account, the data has been binned into spatial bins and angular bins to create average distribution functions for different positions in the near Mars space. The net escape flux for the studied low solar activity period, between May 2007 and May 2011, is 2.0 +/- 0.2 x 10(24) s(-1). The escape has been calculated independently for four different quadrants in the Y-MSO - Zmso plane, south, dusk, north and dawn. Escape is highest from the northern and dusk quadrants, 0.6 +/- 0.1 x 10(24) s(-1), and smallest from the south and dawn quadrants, 0.4 +/- 0.1 x 10(24) s(-1). The flux ratio of molecular (O-2(+) and CO2)+ to 0 ions is 0.9 +/- 0.1, averaged over all quadrants. The flux difference between the north and south quadrants is statistically significant, and is presumed to be due to the presence of significant crustal magnetic fields in the southern hemisphere, reducing the outflow. The difference between the dawn and dusk quadrants is likely due to the magnetic tension associated with the nominal Parker angle spiral, which should lead to higher average magnetic tension on the dusk side. The escape increases during periods of high solar wind flux and during times when co-rotating interaction regions (CIR) affect Mars. In the latter case the increase is a factor 2.4-2.9 as compared to average conditions. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据