4.5 Article

Optical properties of Titan and early Earth haze laboratory analogs in the mid-visible

期刊

ICARUS
卷 207, 期 2, 页码 903-913

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2009.12.015

关键词

Titan; Spectroscopy; Experimental techniques; Photochemistry

资金

  1. NASA [NNX07AV55G, NNX07AF190, NNX08AG93G, NNX09AE12G]
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. EPA
  4. NOAA
  5. NASA [101213, 118336, NNX09AE12G, NNX08AG93G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scattering and absorption of sunlight by aerosols are integral to understanding the radiative balance of any planetary atmosphere covered in a haze, such as Titan and possibly the early Earth. One key optical parameter of an aerosol is its refractive index. We have simulated both Titan and early Earth organic haze aerosols in the laboratory and measured the real and imaginary portion of their refractive index at lambda = 532 nm using cavity ringdown aerosol extinction spectroscopy. This novel technique allows analysis on freely-floating particles minutes after formation. For our Titan analog particles, we find a real refractive index of n = 1.35 +/- 0.01 and an imaginary refractive index k = 0.023 +/- 0.007, and for the early Earth analog particles we find n = 1.81 +/- 0.02 and k = 0.055 +/- 0.020. The Titan analog refractive index has a smaller real and similar imaginary refractive index compared to most previous laboratory measurements of Titan analog films, including values from Khare et al. (Khare, B.N., Sagan, C., Arakawa, E.T., Suits, F., Callcott, TA., Williams, M.W. [1984]. Icarus 60, 127-137). These newly measured Titan analog values have implications for spacecraft retrievals of aerosol properties on Titan. The early Earth analog has a significantly higher real and imaginary refractive index than Titan analogs reported in the literature. These differences suggest that, for a given amount of aerosol, the early Earth analog would act as a stronger anti-greenhouse agent than the Titan analog. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据