4.5 Article

The Dark Spot in the atmosphere of Uranus in 2006: Discovery, description, and dynamical simulations

期刊

ICARUS
卷 201, 期 1, 页码 257-271

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2008.08.019

关键词

Uranus, atmosphere

资金

  1. STScl GO [10170, 10534, 10805, 11118, 11190, 11156]
  2. NASA [NNX06AD12G, NNG06G125G, NNX07AO43G, NNG05GF00G, NNG05G084G, NNX07AK70G]
  3. University of California at Santa Cruz [AST-9876783]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the first definitive detection of a discrete dark atmospheric feature oil Uranus in 2006 using visible and near-infrared images from the Hobble Space Telescope and the Keck II 10-m telescope. Like Neptune's Great Dark Spots, this Uranus Dark Spot had bright companion features that exhibited considerable variability in brightness and location relative to the Dark Spot. We detected the feature or its bright companions on 16 June (Hubble), 30 July and 1 August (Keck), 23-24 August (Hubble), and 15 October (Keck). The dark feature-detected at latitude similar to 28 +/- 1 degrees N with an average physical extent of roughly 2 degrees (1300 km) in latitude and 5 degrees (2700 km) in longitude-moved with a nearly constant zonal velocity of 43.1 +/- 0.1 ms(-1), which is roughly 20 ms(-1) greater than the average observed speed of bright features at this latitude. The dark feature's contrast and extent varied as a function of wavelength, with largest negative Contrast occurring at a Surprisingly long wavelength when compared with Neptune's dark features: the Uranus feature was detected out to 1.6 mu m with a contrast of -0.07, but it was undetectable at 0.467 mu m: the Neptune GDS seen by voyager exhibited its most prominent contrast of -0.12 at 0.48 mu m, and was undetectable longward of 0.7 mu m. Computational fluid dynamic simulations of the dark feature oil Uranus Suggest that Structure in the zonal wind profile may be a critical factor in the emergence of large sustained vortices. (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据