4.5 Article

Relationship between abdominal fat accumulation and insulin resistance in hemodialysis patients

期刊

HYPERTENSION RESEARCH
卷 31, 期 1, 页码 83-88

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1291/hypres.31.83

关键词

abdominal adipose tissue; obesity; insulin resistance; C-reactive protein; hemodialysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is well known that obesity and insulin resistance are closely related to the development of type 2 diabetes. However, the exact pathogenic mechanism underlying the insulin resistance in renal disease has not been clarified. The purpose of the present study was to clarify the contribution of abdominal (visceral and subcutaneous) fat accumulation to insulin resistance and various clinical parameters, including C-reactive protein (CRIP), in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Visceral and subcutaneous fat areas (VFA and SFA) were evaluated at the umbilical level by CT. Insulin resistance was estimated by the homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) in 80 HD patients. Insulin resistance and CRP seemed to be closely correlated with fat-related parameters such as body mass index (BMI), VFA and SFA. HOMA-IR was positively correlated with BMI, VFA, SFA, triglycerides (TG), remnant-like particle (RLP)-cholesterol and CRP in simple regression analysis. In multiple stepwise regression analysis, SFA and RLP-cholesterol were predominant determinants of HOMA-IR in HD patients. Furthermore, CRP was positively correlated with BMI, VFA, SFA, TG, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, atherosclerosis index (AI), immunoreactive insulin (IRI) and HOMA-IR in simple regression analysis. In multiple stepwise regression analysis, VFA and HDL-cholesterol were predominant determinants of CRP in HD patients. In conclusion, insulin resistance and CRP were related to fat-related parameters such as BMI, VFA and SFA in HD patients. Furthermore, the contribution of SFA to insulin resistance was much higher than that of VFA, while the opposite relation was recognized for CRP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据