4.7 Article

Does Brachial Artery Flow-Mediated Vasodilation Provide a Bioassay for NO?

期刊

HYPERTENSION
卷 62, 期 2, 页码 345-351

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.01578

关键词

endothelium; nitric oxide; ultrasonography; Doppler; vasodilation

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [PO1 HL-091830]
  2. Veterans Affairs (VA) Rehabilitation Research & Development grant [E6910R, CDA2 E7560W]
  3. American Heart Association [0835209 N]
  4. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [P01HL091830] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study sought to better define the role of NO in brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) in young, healthy humans. Brachial artery blood velocity and diameter were determined (ultrasound Doppler) in 8 volunteers (26 +/- 1 year) before and after 5-minute forearm circulatory occlusion with and without intra-arterial infusion of the endothelial NO synthase inhibitor N-G-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA; 0.48 mg/dL per minute). Control (CON) and L-NMMA trials were performed with the occlusion cuff placed in the traditional distal position, as well as proximal to the measurement site. FMD was significantly reduced, but not abolished, by L-NMMA in the distal cuff trial (8.9 +/- 1.3%-6.0 +/- 0.7%, CON versus L-NMMA; P=0.02), with no effect of L-NMMA on FMD with proximal cuff placement (10.6 +/- 1.2%-12.4 +/- 1.7%, CON versus L-NMMA; P=0.39). When the reduction in shear stimulus after L-NMMA was taken into account, no drug difference was observed for either distal (0.26 +/- 0.02-0.23 +/- 0.03, CON versus L-NMMA; P=0.40) or proximal (0.23 +/- 0.08-0.23 +/- 0.03, CON versus L-NMMA; P=0.89) FMD trials. These findings challenge the assertion that NO is obligatory for brachial artery FMD and call into question the sensitivity of this procedure for noninvasive determination of NO bioavailability in young, healthy humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据