4.7 Article

Reversal of Genetic Salt-Sensitive Hypertension by Targeted Sympathetic Ablation

期刊

HYPERTENSION
卷 61, 期 4, 页码 806-+

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.00474

关键词

celiac ganglionectomy; Dahl S hypertension; renal denervation; sodium balance; water balance

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 HL076312]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sympathetic nervous system plays an important role in some forms of human hypertension as well as the Dahl salt-sensitive rat model of hypertension; however, the sympathetic targets involved remain unclear. To address this, we examined the role of the renal and splanchnic sympathetic nerves in Dahl hypertension by performing sham surgery (n=10) or targeted sympathetic ablation of the renal nerves (renal denervation, n=11), the splanchnic nerves (celiac ganglionectomy, n=11), or both renal and splanchnic nerves (n=11) in hypertensive Dahl rats. Mean arterial pressure increased from approximate to 120 mm Hg, while on a 0.1% sodium chloride diet, to approximate to 140 mm Hg after being fed a 4.0% sodium chloride diet for 3 weeks. At that point, rats underwent sham or targeted sympathetic ablation. Four weeks after treatment, mean arterial pressure was lower in renal denervated (150.4 +/- 10.4) and celiac ganglionectomized (147.0 +/- 6.1) rats compared with sham rats (165.0 +/- 3.7) and even lower in rats that underwent both ablations (128.4 +/- 6.6). There were no differences in heart rate or fluid balance between sham and renal denervated rats; however, rats that underwent either celiac ganglionectomy or both ablations exhibited marked tachycardia as well as sodium and water retention after treatment. These data suggest that targeted sympathetic ablation is an effective treatment for established hypertension in the Dahl rat and that the kidneys and the splanchnic vascular bed are both independently important targets of the sympathetic nervous system in this model. (Hypertension. 2013;61:806-811.). Online Data Supplement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据