4.7 Article

Vascular Function and the Role of Oxidative Stress in Heart Failure, Heart Transplant, and Beyond

期刊

HYPERTENSION
卷 60, 期 3, 页码 659-668

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.193318

关键词

antioxidants; flow-mediated vasodilation; vascular health; blood flow

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [P01 HL091830]
  2. American Heart Association [0835209N]
  3. VA Merit Grant [EG910R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD), reactive hyperemia, and an acute oral antioxidant cocktail (AOC; vitamins C and E and alpha-lipoic acid), this study aimed to provide greater insight into altered vascular function and the role of oxidative stress in chronic heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and at several time points beyond heart transplantation (HTx). A total of 61 age-matched subjects (12 healthy controls, 14 New York Heart Association class II and III HFrEF, and 35 HTx recipients [<3 years post-HTx, 5-10 years post-HTx, and >14 years post-HTx]) ingested either placebo (PL) or an AOC before FMD and reactive hyperemia testing of the brachial artery. Vascular function, as measured by FMD, was not different among the controls (6.8 +/- 1.9%), recent <3-year post-HTx group (8.1 +/- 1.2%), and the 5- to 10-year post-HTx group (5.5 +/- 1.0%). However, PL FMD was lower in the HFrEF (4.5 +/- 0.7%) and in the >14-year post-HTx group (2.9 +/- 0.8%). The AOC increased plasma ascorbate levels in all of the groups but only increased FMD in the controls (PL, 6.8 +/- 1.9%; AOC, 9.2 +/- 1.0%) and >14-year post-HTx recipients (PL, 2.9 +/- 0.8%; AOC, 4.5 +/- 1.3%). There were no differences in reactive hyperemia in any of the groups with PL or AOC. This cross-sectional study reveals that, compared with controls, vascular function is blunted in HFrEF, is similar soon after HTx, but is decreased with greater time post-HTx with free radicals implicated in this progression. (Hypertension. 2012; 60: 659-668.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据