4.7 Article

Impaired Baroreflex Gain During Pregnancy in Conscious Rats Role of Brain Insulin

期刊

HYPERTENSION
卷 57, 期 2, 页码 283-288

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.162354

关键词

heart rate; insulin resistance; baroreceptor reflex sensitivity; pregnant; cerebrospinal fluid insulin

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL088552]
  2. American Heart Association, Pacific Mountain Affiliate
  3. Medical Research Foundation of Oregon
  4. Murdock Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pregnancy impairs baroreflex gain, but the mechanism is incompletely understood. To test the hypothesis that reductions in brain insulin contribute, we determined whether pregnant rats exhibit lower cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) insulin concentrations and whether intracerebroventricular infusion of insulin normalizes gain of baroreflex control of heart rate in conscious pregnant rats. CSF insulin was lower in pregnant (68 +/- 21 pg/mL) compared to virgin (169 +/- 25 pg/mL) rats (P < 0.05).Pregnancy reduced baroreflex gain (pregnant 2.4 +/- 0.2 bpm/mm Hg, virgin 4.6 +/- 0.3 bpm/mm Hg; P < 0.0001) and the maximum heart rate elicited by hypotension (pregnant 455 +/- 15 bpm, virgin 507 +/- 12 bpm; P = 0.01). Infusion of insulin (100 mu U/min) intracerebroventricularly increased baroreflex gain in pregnant (2.4 +/- 0.4 to 3.9 +/- 0.5 bpm/mm Hg; P < 0.01) but not virgin (4.6 +/- 0.4 to 4.2 +/- 0.4 bpm/mm Hg; NS) rats. Maximum heart rate was not altered by intracerebroventricular insulin in either group. Interestingly, while in pregnant rats the baroreflex was unchanged by intracerebroventricular infusion of the artificial CSF vehicle, in virgin rats, vehicle infusion lowered baroreflex gain (4.7 +/- 0.3 to 3.9 +/- 0.3 bpm/mm Hg; P < 0.05) and the maximum baroreflex heart rate (495 +/- 19 to 444 +/- 21 bpm; P < 0.05). These data support the hypothesis that brain insulin is required to support optimal baroreflex function and that a decrease in brain insulin contributes to the fall in baroreflex gain during pregnancy. (Hypertension. 2011;57:283-288.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据