4.7 Article

Aging Is Associated With Reduced Prostacyclin-Mediated Dilation in the Human Forearm

期刊

HYPERTENSION
卷 53, 期 6, 页码 973-978

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.121483

关键词

aging; prostaglandins; NO; blood flow

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [UL1 RR024150, UL1-RR24150] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-46493, R01 HL046493-17, R01 HL046493] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32 GM008685-11, GM-08685, T32 GM008685] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aging is associated with reduced endothelial function. There is indirect evidence for reduced prostacyclin (PGI(2))-mediated vasodilation with aging, but it is unknown whether this is because of reduced dilation to PGI(2) or altered production. In addition, the contribution of endothelial NO to PGI(2)-mediated dilation is unknown. Using plethysmography to determine forearm blood flow, we studied the effect of PGI(2) in 10 older (61 to 73 years) and 10 younger (19 to 45 years) subjects using 3 escalating intra-arterial doses of PGI(2) (epoprostenol). PGI(2) was also administered after NO synthase inhibition with N-G-monomethyl-L-arginine acetate. The percent of change in forearm vascular conductance (mean -/++/- SEM) from baseline after PGI(2) was significantly lower (P = 0.002) in the aging individuals (52 +/- 11%, 164 +/- 23%, and 221 +/- 27% versus 115 +/- 20%, 249 +/- 19%, and 370 +/- 35%). In addition, the group-by-dose interaction was also significant (P = 0.018). After NO synthase inhibition, the dose-response curve to PGI(2) was blunted in the young subjects but unchanged in the older subjects; the difference between the groups was no longer significant. Our data suggest that the reduced dilator effects of PGI(2) in older individuals are attributable to a reduction in the contribution of endothelial-derived NO versus alterations in the direct effects of PGI(2) on vascular smooth muscle. (Hypertension. 2009; 53: 973-978.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据