4.7 Article

Immediate mineralocorticoid receptor blockade improves myocardial infarct healing by modulation of the inflammatory response

期刊

HYPERTENSION
卷 51, 期 4, 页码 905-914

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.100941

关键词

aldosterone; healing; inflammation; myocardial infarction; heart failure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) blockade reduces morbidity and mortality after acute myocardial infarction; however, the underlying mechanisms are still under investigation. This study examined whether MR antagonism promotes healing of the infarcted myocardium. Starting immediately after coronary ligation, male Wistar rats were treated with the selective MR antagonist eplerenone ( 100 mg/kg per day by gavage) or placebo for 2 to 7 days. At 7 days, eplerenone therapy versus placebo significantly reduced thinning and dilatation of the infarcted wall, improved left ventricular function, and enhanced neovessel formation in the injured myocardium. At 2 days, eplerenone-treated rats displayed lower plasma corticosterone levels, higher circulating blood monocytes, and more macrophages infiltrating the infarcted myocardium. MR blockade led to a transient upregulation ( at days 2 and 3 but not at day 7) of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-1 beta, interleukin-6, interleukin-10, and interleukin-4 and an increase in factor XIIIa protein expression in the healing myocardium. Prevention of macrophage accumulation into the infarct zone by treatment with liposome-encapsulated clodronate almost abrogated the protein expression of factor XIIIa and the beneficial effects of eplerenone on infarct expansion. In conclusion, selective MR blockade immediately after myocardial infarction accelerated macrophage infiltration and transiently increased the expression of healing promoting cytokines and factor XIIIa in the injured myocardium resulting in enhanced infarct neovascularization and reduced early LV dilation and dysfunction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据