4.7 Article

Recovery of Ti and Li from spent lithium titanate cathodes by a hydrometallurgical process

期刊

HYDROMETALLURGY
卷 147, 期 -, 页码 210-216

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2014.05.013

关键词

Spent lithium titanate batteries; Leaching liquor; Solvent extraction; TiO2 nano-powders

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21176266]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University [72150050350]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the potential application of lithium titanate (Li4Ti5O12) battery, recovering Ti and Li from the spent batteries remains a largely unexplored but important topic In this contribution, a process including leaching, extraction for the separation of titanium from leaching liquor and synthesizing TiO2 nano-particles by a homogeneous precipitation method is presented as a successful strategy. Various operating parameters were optimized, affording more than 97% leaching efficiency of both Ti and Li at a sulfuric acid solution of 4 M, H2O2 of 20 vol.%, solid-to-liquid ratio of 0.025 g mL(-1), leaching temperature of 80 degrees C and leaching time of 4 h. In the case of the extraction, the solvent extraction efficiency of titanium about 99% can be achieved with 30 vol.% primary amine N1923 as an extractant and kerosene as a diluent at highly acidic condition, organic phase/aqueous phase (O/A) ratio 2:1 within 10 min of contact time in ambient temperature, while the solvent extraction efficiency of lithium is only 1.4%. The raffinate was concentrated from 0.74 g L-1 to 1.11 g L-1 by evaporation, then lithium carbonate was precipitated by adding saturated solution of sodium carbonate affording 85% recovery. Finally, the stripping was fast with equilibrium time of 10 min with 2 M H2SO4 and titanium stripping of 98%. The results of XRD and SEM show that the size of as-prepared TiO2 powders is 100-200 nm from the stripped solution by the homogeneous precipitation method. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据